About this site

What this site is, who wrote it, and how you can use its content.

Overview

This website has a dual purpose: it serves as my personal webpage and as an apologetics resource devoted to articulating the Christian faith through essays, videos, sermons, and course notes.

Close-up of an open old book with worn pages, warm sepia tones, resting on a soft surface

Frequently asked questions

Who are you?

I am a theoretical chemist currently working at Duke University. You can read more about how I became a Christian in my essay "How I became a Christian."

What is this site?

It functions as both my personal homepage and an apologetics site devoted to articulating the Christian faith.

Why all the Wikipedia references?

I wanted a source of information that was readily accessible, free, and carried no intrinsic religious bias. Wikipedia was the resource that best met these criteria.

How do you select the topics for essays?

Topics are chosen because they reflect questions I have encountered in conversation, reading, or study, and where a thoughtful written response seems worthwhile.

Can I reuse or repost the contents of this site elsewhere?

Yes. The content on this site can be reused or reposted with attribution to the author.

Why did you create this site?

I created this site both as a personal homepage and as a place to share resources that articulate and defend the Christian faith for readers who may be skeptical, curious, or seeking to deepen their understanding.

Many people arrive at a personal webpage wanting to know who is behind it and what motivates the content. A thoughtful homepage often pairs biographical context with the larger purpose of the site, giving visitors a reason to linger beyond a brief visit. When the author is also the curator of a topical resource, that dual role can shape everything from layout choices to writing style. The question of identity and intent frames nearly every other decision about how information is organized, prioritized, and presented to readers who may arrive with very different backgrounds and expectations.

A resource that doubles as a personal homepage must balance familiarity with focus. Visitors seeking substantive material on a specific theme appreciate knowing that the content reflects sustained study rather than passing interest. At the same time, an author who shares something of their own story invites trust, which is especially important when the subject matter touches on questions of belief, worldview, and reasoned argument. The best pages find a way to weave together personal voice and topical depth without letting either one crowd the other out, so that readers leave with both useful material and a clearer sense of who compiled it.

Frequently asked questions serve as a useful gateway for new visitors who are unsure where to begin. A well-written FAQ anticipates recurring curiosities and addresses them directly, sparing readers the need to hunt through archives for basic details. Topics often include the author's background, the scope of the site, and the reasoning behind editorial choices that might otherwise seem arbitrary. Explaining methodology, citation habits, or design decisions in plain language signals transparency and invites continued engagement, because visitors understand not only what they are reading but also how the material was assembled and why certain conventions were adopted along the way.

When a site draws on an external encyclopedia for references, explaining that choice helps visitors judge the reliability of the claims being made. Citing widely recognized sources lends credibility, but it also raises fair questions about selectivity and interpretation. Authors who acknowledge these tensions demonstrate intellectual honesty and make their arguments easier to evaluate on their own terms. Readers benefit when they can see the chain of reasoning that links a source to a conclusion, rather than being asked to take assertions on faith alone. That openness reinforces the broader aim of any responsible resource, which is to inform rather than merely persuade.

The combination of personal introduction and topical resource ultimately reflects a conviction that ideas are best transmitted by people, not by anonymous platforms. A homepage that names its author and explains its mission offers readers a starting point for ongoing dialogue, whether they come looking for essays, presentations, or simply a sense of how a particular perspective took shape. Inviting questions and clarifying intent from the outset lowers barriers for newcomers and sets a tone of accessibility. In doing so, the page becomes more than a directory of links; it becomes an introduction to a sustained conversation worth joining.

Get in touch

For correspondence, visit the Contact page for the mailing address and social media links.